Publications & White Papers

Archive for May, 2010

Predictive drug supply modelling in clinical trials

May 26th, 2010

Predictive drug supply modelling in clinical trials

Vladimir Anisimov

Presented at PSI conference, Manchester, 18 May 2010

How has meta-analysis been changing?

May 26th, 2010

How has meta-analysis been changing

Peter Lane

Presented at PSI Conference, Manchester, 17 May 2010

Drug Supply Modeling Software: User Manual

May 5th, 2010

Drug Supply Modeling Software: User Manual

Vladimir Anisimov, Valerii Fedorov, Richard Heiberger, Sourish Saha and Mark Kothapalli

Published as GSK DDS Technical Report 2010-01

Abstract: The design of multicentre clinical studies consists of several interconnected stages including patient recruitment prediction, choosing a randomization scheme and a statistical model for analyzing patient responses, and drug supply planning. The Research Statistics Unit (RSU) at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has developed a risk-based supply modeling tool using statistical principles. The tool predicts drug supply needed to cover patient’s demand in a single study with a given risk of running out of stock for a patient. In order to support Clinical Trials Supply and Global Supplies Operations teams at GSK, the RSU created a user-friendly RExcel interface embedding the risk-based supply modeling tool into the Excel environment. This manual discusses screenshots to guide the user through using the interface.

Comparisons of minimisation and Atkinson’s algorithm

May 5th, 2010

Comparisons of minimisation and Atkinson’s algorithm

Stephen Senn, Vladimir Anisimov and Valerii Fedorov

Published in Statistics in Medicine, 2010, V. 29, 7/8, pp. 721-730

Abstract: Some general points regarding efficiency in clinical trials are made. Reasons as to why fitting many covariates to adjust the estimate of the treatment effect may be less problematic than commonly supposed are given. Two methods of dynamic allocation of patients based on covariates, minimization and Atkinson’s approach, are compared and contrasted for the particular case where all covariates are binary. The results of Monte Carlo simulations are also presented. It is concluded that in the cases considered, Atkinson’s approach is slightly more efficient than minimization although the difference is unlikely to be very important in practice. Both are more efficient than simple randomization, although it is concluded that fitting covariates may make a more valuable and instructive contribution to inferences about treatment effects than only balancing them.

Predictive modelling of patient recruitment in clinical trials

May 5th, 2010

Predictive modelling of patient recruitment in clinical trials

Vladimir Anisimov

Presented at 3rd Annual Effective Patient Recruitment in Clinical Trials Conference, Vienna, 26 April 2010 (via broadcast from UK)

Stochastic differential equations with positive solutions in modeling and design of pharmacokinetic studies

May 5th, 2010

Adjustment of patient recruitment in the Bayesian setting

May 5th, 2010

Adjustment of patient recruitment in the Bayesian setting

Frank Mannino

Presented at ENAR, New Orleans, 22 Mar 2010

Patient recruitment and drug supply modelling in multicentre clinical trials (statistical methodology and implementation)

May 5th, 2010

Patient recruitment and drug supply modelling in multicentre clinical trials (statistical methodology and implementation)

Vladimir Anisimov

Presented at PSI Statistical Interest Group on Modelling & Simulation, Cambridge, UK, 31 March 2010