Publications & White Papers

Archive for 2000

Estimation of the Combined Response to treatment in Multicentre Trials

August 1st, 2000

Estimation of the Combined Response to Treatment in Multicentre Trials

Vladimir Dragalin, Valerii Fedorov, Byron Jones and Frank Rockhold

Abstract. Analyses of multicentre trials consider the estimated treatment effect differences of the individual centres and combine them in an estimate of the overall treatment effect. There has been much debate in the literature concerning the best way to combine these treatment effect differences. We emphasize that first of all one should define the combined response to treatment (CRT), the object that has to be estimated from the results of a multicentre clinical trial. Having the defined target in mind, the least squares estimators of the CRT under three possible models of increasing complexity for multicentre data are derived. We compare these estimators in terms of their mean squared errors. It is shown that the choice of CRT determines not only the best estimator, but also the allocation of patients among the centres that minimizes the MSE. A new estimator of the CRT is proposed that is based on a preliminary clustering of the centres and the use of a weighted average of the Type I estimators obtained from within each cluster. The clustering aims to minimize the bias of the combined estimator. We show via a simulation study that the simple clustering procedure provides a reasonably improved estimator. The clustering can be done on unblinded data, as long as the numbers of patients on each treatment arm in each centre are known.

Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trials Based Upon the Treatment Comparison Measure, Pr(Y1

July 26th, 2000

A Confidence Region for Optimal Factor Levels Subject to a Constrained Region

May 1st, 2000

A Confidence Region for Optimal Factor Levels Subject to a Constrained Region

John J. Peterson

Abstract: For a response surface experiment, an approximate hypothesis test and an associated confidence region is proposed for the minimizing (or maximizing) factor-level configuration within a specified, bounded region. These constraint regions can be quite general. This allows for more realistic constraint modeling and a wide degree of applicability including constraints occurring in mixture experiments. The usual assumption of a quadratic model is also generalized to include any regression model that is linear in the model parameters. An intimate connection is established between this confidence region and the Box-Hunter (1954) confidence region for a stationary point (in an unconstrained setting). As a byproduct this methodology also provides a way to construct a confidence interval for the difference between the optimal mean response and the mean response at a specified factor level configuration .  The application of this confidence region is illustrated with three examples. Some related simulations indicate that this confidence region has good coverage properties.